Previous Page  74 / 94 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 74 / 94 Next Page
Page Background

P.

74

2018 Pillar 3 Disclosures

Annex

Below, in accordance with the information advanced

in Title 2 of this document, this Annex includes

detailed information on the management objectives

and policies connected with each of the risks having a

significant impact:

1. Credit risk

Objectives, general policies with regard to

assumption and management of risks

The General Risk Management Framework approved by

the Board, implementing the Risk Tolerance Framework,

contains the policies regarding the assumption and

management of credit risk.

This document is the foundation upon which the

management of internal risk is based, and determines

the governance and monitoring structure. It also

determines the internal limit structure, and processes

for risk admission, assessment, mitigation, and

coverage, as well as pricing.

The policy highlights that the portfolio is made up of,

primarily, exposures with a low level of risk and shows

that other risks with a worse credit rating are rare,

exceptional, and few in number.

Credit Risk Processes and Management

This is one of the basic risks to which Cecabank is

exposed through its various business units.

Credit Risk is defined as the risk which affects or could

affect results or capital as a result of a breach by a

borrower of the commitments set out in any contract,

or the possibility that it might not act as agreed. This

category includes:

1.

Principal risk.

Resulting from a failure to repay the

principal.

2. Substitution or counterparty risk.

This refers to the

capacity and intention of the counterparty to comply

with its contractual responsibilities at the time of

maturity. Credit risk exists throughout the lifespan of

the operation, but may vary from one day to another

because of settlement mechanisms and changes in

the market valuation of operations.

3. Wrong-way risk:

As counterparty risk, depending

on the nature of the specific transactions, OTC

derivative instruments can also have adverse

effects from correlation between exposure to risk

with a specific counterparty and credit quality, in

such a way that when it decreases, exposure to the

counterparty increases. This risk is called wrong-

way risk.

4. Issuer risk.

This risk arises when trading financial

assets of an issuer on primary and/or secondary

markets, and is defined as the risk that a loss in

their value could occur as a result of a change in the

market perception of the economic and financial

strength of the issuer.

5. Settlement or handover risk.

This is the risk that

one of the parties settles the transaction and that

the agreed consideration is not received.

6. Country risk.

This is the credit risk which applies to

the debts of borrowers in another country because of

circumstances beyond the standard commercial risk.

It may take the form of a transfer risk or sovereign

risk, and other risks derived from international

financial activity.

7. Concentration risk.

This measures the degree of

concentration of credit risk portfolios under different

relevant dimensions: geographical areas and countries,

economic sectors, products and client groups.

8. Residual risk.

This incorporates risks derived from

strategies for dynamic hedging, credit risk mitigation

techniques, securitisations, etc.

In order to manage credit risk properly, a number of

procedures are established, the key elements of which

are described below.

Credit Risk Analysis

The process of assessing the credit rating of

counterparties and the assignment of limits are closely

connected. As a result, an internal rating is granted

to the various counterparties with which operations

are desired. This internal rating contributes to the

establishment of the maximum amount of risk allowed

with each entity. It also constitutes the baseline for the

admission and monitoring of the risk.

The rating is the result of the analysis of various

quantitative and qualitative factors, which are assessed

independently and are given a specific weighting for

the calculation of the final rating. The result is an

Risk Management Policies and Objectives

A | A.I